Despite the Netherlands’ prosperity, regulatory inconsistencies raise concerns. Homeopathy faces strict restrictions, while misleading claims on harmful mouthwashes go unchecked. This disparity undermines public trust, favors commercial interests, and questions government transparency. True health innovation demands evidence-based policy, not selective regulation.
Picture: Enlighten
Shouldn’t leadership prioritize consumer well-being over industry profit?
As you probably already know, I live in the Netherlands, a prosperous country for many. But if you think that everything is settled then you are wrong. Yes, many things will be easier for us than in other places in this beautiful world, but for me there remain many mysteries
Picture: Sabka dentist
In the way things are arranged in our beautiful country. Yes, if everything is ok, there must be something to complain about, right? But it’s not a complaint, but a question that I can’t quite figure out, and maybe you can help me? Years ago, there was a minister who forbade mentioning the effect on the packaging of homeopathic (healthy) remedies.
Questioning Healthcare Regulation and Consumer Rights
The packaging of a homeopathic item was therefore not allowed to state what it was for and what it could be used for. It was stated that not mentioning the operation would prevent misleading. This concerned public health in general, according to the then ruling Minister of Health Edith Schippers. However, I cannot escape the impression that this decision was also taken to protect regular healthcare in the Netherlands against loss of income. It is now increasingly scientifically established that many of the items for which the effect was not stated on the packaging actually have a health-enhancing or healing effect. However, the government does not correct this.
Dental Care, Mouthwash, and the Truth About Healthy Teeth
Now yesterday I was in a drugstore chain for my monthly shopping. I saw the shelf there full of so-called mouthwashes from many different brands. Because I didn’t really know which one to choose, I read a lot of the texts on the packaging. Much was (is) promised! If you don’t use it, you will have bad breath and unhealthy teeth. All these mouthwashes promise healthy teeth if you continue to rinse with their item daily. While scientific research has long shown that mouthwashes are very bad for the condition of your teeth and other bacteria in your body.
Consumer Trust and Ethical Leadership in Health Policy
These rinses also kill many of the healthy bacteria that our body naturally needs. How is that possible? Who decides on these kinds of things? Does Edith Schippers have shares in the mouthwash industry? It provides extra income for dentists, who themselves indicate that the use of that stuff is very dangerous. I am only seeking the truth for the greater good. And why does no one ban these items, or at least prohibit them from mentioning their effectiveness on the packaging? Is this not in our interest as a customer? Does our government not consider our health as important as we think, or is it again said that “WE” should use our health?
Leave a Reply