Einstein, Freud, Jung, and Hawking shaped modern thought—but what of the unseen influence of women behind their work? History, written by victors and shaped by power, may conceal more than it reveals. As we question long-held truths, reality becomes a mirror of evolving awareness—one where forgotten voices begin to reshape our understanding of the world.
Picture: Canva
Do you ever wake up with the idea that things could have turned out a little differently in the world? The unsettled feeling that you are missing or have missed things. Maybe the feeling that something is not quite right somewhere, or perhaps wrongly documented by the person who entrusted it to the paper? Under the influence of time, more and more new details about our shared past are emerging. Think, for example, of the stories I mentioned earlier by Yuval Noah Harari (Sapiens) and Peter Ackroyd (Reizen door de tijd), or Thomas Hertog, a former student of Steven Hawkins, the most adored scientist of “our” time.
Is their reality also our reality?
Perhaps you, like me, have already read these books? It strikes me more and more often that a great deal has been rewritten in many areas, especially since the year 2000. Think, for example, of Albert Einstein, Carl Gustav Jung and Sigmund Freud. Many of these gentlemen, I suspect, have written down their stories and discoveries to the best of their ability, in their time. But even today, these people still have many followers. People who might believe that what is written in a history book must be the truth, because why else did they write it down? You can’t really blame many of these early writers, because: “You don’t see it until you see it.” Many things were simply hidden because the research possibilities for these were still limited. For years, Einstein disagreed with Niels Bohr, another scientist, about the Big Bang and the further development of the earth.
Are there still assumptions in our history?
The above question is quite difficult to answer, because who actually has a monopoly on wisdom? Who, for example, elaborated on the chimeras of other or previous scientists? Have there been enough truth checks on the things they adopted from their predecessors in history? Were these truth-checks even possible in the times in which they lived? Even a great like Steven Hawkins has had to back down after writing his book: “A Brief History.” A book in which he insisted that the earth and human life had arisen from the Big Bang, and that nothing existed before that. Steven Hawkins is a man who is often described as someone who started from his own intuition, and also accepted it as truth to further develop his philosophy.
Was the Big Bang really the beginning of our times?
Every time I catch these scientists thinking that we as humans are so complicated that we must have been created by a larger being.The name of this being is of completely secondary importance to many of them. They come up with this because so much has been organically adapted to man in the development of time that this cannot have happened by itself or by the influence of a human being. If, for the sake of convenience, you also apply this statement to the further development of our earth, then there are also the necessary coincidences, which are probably still not sufficiently recognized by us as humans. We, as well as the aforementioned great thinkers, are still collectively dealing with these coincidences, to which those scientists have given a twist in order to be able to continue with the development of their theories.
Are our theories about reality correct?
All theories are, of course, “liquefied under pressure” It often worked out well in this way, because the rest of humanity could not yet comprehend it anyway. Also think about our further history books. Many people still have to memorize these for their education, but why? I think history is becoming more and more like philosophy. You can think about these ideas, and give them a twist yourself. Recently, of course, it was also revealed that many of our current history books were written by victors in the intoxication of victory, and mainly by men. Of course, these men will also have been whispered by much more intelligent women of their time. Many of these victors’ sagas now appear to be very rosy in the present time, and have only been written to their mouths.
Will woman be the victor of our history?
After reading and studying many “history books” I dare to say that the history of our earth must have at least looked different than we think now. Think for a moment of the influence that all the undescribed women in our world must have had on the development of us and our earth. Think of all the existing theories that have been modified by scientists to make their story look better, and that the rest of us have not thought about further. The story that has been “just” adopted by almost all of humanity. Please keep in mind “that the world was developed by chances, but science is not based on chances, but on what is it?”
Leave a Reply